policy: surface exit nodes via autogroup:internet (#3212)
compileFilterRules skipped autogroup:internet destinations to keep them out of the wire-format PacketFilter, but those same compiled rules are the source of pm.matchers — and Node.CanAccess relies on a matcher whose DestsIsTheInternet covers the public internet to surface exit-node peers to ACL sources. With the skip in place no such matcher existed, exit nodes silently dropped out of the source's peer list, and the docs' exit-node walkthrough stopped working: `tailscale exit-node list` returned "no exit nodes found" and `tailscale set --exit-node=<ip>` returned "no node found in netmap with IP". Drop the compile-time skip so autogroup:internet flows through normal matcher derivation, and teach ReduceFilterRules to keep the resulting client packet-filter rule on exit-route advertisers — Tailscale SaaS sends those rules to exit nodes so the kernel filter accepts traffic forwarded by autogroup:internet sources. Verified against a live tailnet on 2026-04-28 via tscap; the b17/b18 captures land under testdata/issue_3212/ as a regression guard. The captures are isolated from testdata/routes_results/ because the broader TestRoutesCompat machinery assumes a CIDR-prefix wire format that differs from the IPSet-range form SaaS emits for autogroup:internet — aligning that wire format is tracked separately. Fixes #3212
This commit is contained in:
parent
a7d405a255
commit
c7a0ca709f
8 changed files with 22985 additions and 11 deletions
172
hscontrol/policy/v2/issue_3212_test.go
Normal file
172
hscontrol/policy/v2/issue_3212_test.go
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
|
|||
// Tests pinned against tscap captures for juanfont/headscale#3212.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// The captures were taken on 2026-04-28 against a live Tailscale SaaS
|
||||
// tailnet. They reproduce the literal #3212 setup: an ACL granting
|
||||
// access to autogroup:internet:* combined with autoApprovers.exitNode
|
||||
// approving exit routes on tagged exit nodes. SaaS surfaces those exit
|
||||
// nodes as peers in the ACL source's netmap with 0.0.0.0/0 and ::/0 in
|
||||
// AllowedIPs. Headscale must do the same — that is the user-visible UX
|
||||
// driving `tailscale exit-node list`.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Captures live under testdata/issue_3212/ rather than testdata/
|
||||
// routes_results/ so the broader TestRoutesCompat / *PeerAllowedIPs /
|
||||
// *ReduceRoutes machinery does not pull them in. Those tests assume a
|
||||
// PacketFilterRules wire format (CIDR prefix per dest entry) that
|
||||
// differs from what SaaS emits for autogroup:internet (range form per
|
||||
// IPSet range — e.g. "0.0.0.0-9.255.255.255"). Aligning that wire
|
||||
// format is tracked separately; the #3212 fix is about peer
|
||||
// visibility, not packet-filter encoding.
|
||||
|
||||
package v2
|
||||
|
||||
import (
|
||||
"path/filepath"
|
||||
"slices"
|
||||
"strings"
|
||||
"testing"
|
||||
|
||||
"github.com/juanfont/headscale/hscontrol/types"
|
||||
"github.com/juanfont/headscale/hscontrol/types/testcapture"
|
||||
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
||||
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
|
||||
"tailscale.com/net/tsaddr"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
// TestIssue3212AutogroupInternetExitVisibility loads the b17/b18
|
||||
// SaaS captures and asserts headscale's BuildPeerMap surfaces every
|
||||
// exit-route advertiser to every ACL-source node — matching the peer
|
||||
// list in the captured netmap.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// The bug fixed by this PR (#3212) was that headscale skipped
|
||||
// autogroup:internet during FilterRule compilation, which silently
|
||||
// dropped the matchers that Node.CanAccess reads via DestsIsTheInternet.
|
||||
// The captures pin the SaaS-equivalent expectation as a regression
|
||||
// guard so the same skip cannot sneak back in unnoticed.
|
||||
func TestIssue3212AutogroupInternetExitVisibility(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
t.Parallel()
|
||||
|
||||
files := []string{
|
||||
"routes-b17-autogroup-internet-with-exit-autoapprover",
|
||||
"routes-b18-autogroup-internet-wildcard-src-with-exit-autoapprover",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for _, testID := range files {
|
||||
path := filepath.Join(
|
||||
"testdata", "issue_3212", testID+".hujson",
|
||||
)
|
||||
tf := loadRoutesTestFile(t, path)
|
||||
|
||||
t.Run(tf.TestID, func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
t.Parallel()
|
||||
|
||||
users, nodes := buildRoutesUsersAndNodes(t, tf.Topology)
|
||||
policyJSON := convertPolicyUserEmails(tf.Input.FullPolicy)
|
||||
|
||||
pm, err := NewPolicyManager(
|
||||
policyJSON, users, nodes.ViewSlice(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
require.NoErrorf(t, err,
|
||||
"%s: failed to create PolicyManager", tf.TestID,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
peerMap := pm.BuildPeerMap(nodes.ViewSlice())
|
||||
|
||||
expected := expectedExitPeerVisibility(t, tf, nodes)
|
||||
require.NotEmptyf(t, expected,
|
||||
"%s: capture exposes no source→exit relationships — "+
|
||||
"the test is meaningless if SaaS itself never "+
|
||||
"surfaced an exit node to a source",
|
||||
tf.TestID,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
for srcName, exitNames := range expected {
|
||||
srcNode := findNodeByGivenName(nodes, srcName)
|
||||
require.NotNilf(t, srcNode,
|
||||
"%s: src node %q missing from topology",
|
||||
tf.TestID, srcName,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
peerIDs := make(
|
||||
map[types.NodeID]struct{},
|
||||
len(peerMap[srcNode.ID]),
|
||||
)
|
||||
for _, p := range peerMap[srcNode.ID] {
|
||||
peerIDs[p.ID()] = struct{}{}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for _, exitName := range exitNames {
|
||||
exitNode := findNodeByGivenName(nodes, exitName)
|
||||
require.NotNilf(t, exitNode,
|
||||
"%s: exit node %q missing from topology",
|
||||
tf.TestID, exitName,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
_, found := peerIDs[exitNode.ID]
|
||||
assert.Truef(t, found,
|
||||
"%s: source %q must see exit node %q "+
|
||||
"as a peer via the autogroup:internet "+
|
||||
"ACL — Tailscale SaaS does (#3212)",
|
||||
tf.TestID, srcName, exitName,
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// expectedExitPeerVisibility extracts (source-node, exit-node) pairs
|
||||
// the capture's netmaps witness. A node is treated as an exit-route
|
||||
// advertiser when its ApprovedRoutes contain 0.0.0.0/0 or ::/0;
|
||||
// a (source, exit) pair is recorded when the source's captured netmap
|
||||
// lists the advertiser as a peer with 0.0.0.0/0 or ::/0 in AllowedIPs.
|
||||
func expectedExitPeerVisibility(
|
||||
t *testing.T,
|
||||
tf *testcapture.Capture,
|
||||
nodes types.Nodes,
|
||||
) map[string][]string {
|
||||
t.Helper()
|
||||
|
||||
v4Exit := tsaddr.AllIPv4()
|
||||
v6Exit := tsaddr.AllIPv6()
|
||||
|
||||
exitAdvertisers := make(map[string]bool)
|
||||
|
||||
for _, n := range nodes {
|
||||
if slices.Contains(n.ApprovedRoutes, v4Exit) ||
|
||||
slices.Contains(n.ApprovedRoutes, v6Exit) {
|
||||
exitAdvertisers[n.GivenName] = true
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
expected := make(map[string][]string)
|
||||
|
||||
for srcName, capture := range tf.Captures {
|
||||
if capture.Netmap == nil {
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
var seen []string
|
||||
|
||||
for _, peer := range capture.Netmap.Peers {
|
||||
peerName := strings.Split(peer.Name(), ".")[0]
|
||||
|
||||
if !exitAdvertisers[peerName] {
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
peerAllowed := peer.AllowedIPs().AsSlice()
|
||||
if !slices.Contains(peerAllowed, v4Exit) &&
|
||||
!slices.Contains(peerAllowed, v6Exit) {
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
seen = append(seen, peerName)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if len(seen) > 0 {
|
||||
expected[srcName] = seen
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return expected
|
||||
}
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue