all: apply godoc [Name] link conventions across comments

Every Go-identifier reference in // and /* */ comments now uses
godoc's [Name] linking syntax so pkg.go.dev and `go doc` render
them as clickable cross-references. No behaviour change.

Pattern applied across the tree:
  In-package         [Foo], [Foo.Bar]
  Cross-package      [pkg.Foo], [pkg.Foo.Bar]
  Stdlib             [netip.Prefix], [errors.Is], [context.Context]
  Tailscale          [tailcfg.MapResponse], [tailcfg.Node.CapMap],
                     [tailcfg.NodeAttrSuggestExitNode]

Skip rules:
  - File:line refs left as plain text
  - HuJSON wire keys inside backtick raw strings untouched
  - ACL/policy syntax tokens (tag:foo, autogroup:self, ...) not Go
    symbols, left as plain text
  - JSON/OIDC wire keys, gorm tags, RFC IPv6 placeholders, markdown
    link tags, decorative dividers — all left as-is
This commit is contained in:
Kristoffer Dalby 2026-05-18 18:35:53 +00:00
parent 17236fd284
commit 4cca63155d
124 changed files with 1037 additions and 1011 deletions

View file

@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ type interactiveStep struct {
stepType string // stepTypeInitialRequest, stepTypeAuthCompletion, or stepTypeFollowupRequest
expectAuthURL bool
expectCacheEntry bool
callAuthPath bool // Real call to HandleNodeFromAuthPath, not mocked
callAuthPath bool // Real call to [state.State.HandleNodeFromAuthPath], not mocked
}
//nolint:gocyclo // comprehensive test function with many scenarios
@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ func TestAuthenticationFlows(t *testing.T) {
return "", err
}
// Wait for node to be available in NodeStore
// Wait for node to be available in [state.NodeStore]
require.EventuallyWithT(t, func(c *assert.CollectT) {
_, found := app.state.GetNodeByNodeKey(nodeKey1.Public())
assert.True(c, found, "node should be available in NodeStore")
@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ func TestAuthenticationFlows(t *testing.T) {
return "", err
}
// Wait for node to be available in NodeStore
// Wait for node to be available in [state.NodeStore]
require.EventuallyWithT(t, func(c *assert.CollectT) {
_, found := app.state.GetNodeByNodeKey(nodeKey1.Public())
assert.True(c, found, "node should be available in NodeStore")
@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ func TestAuthenticationFlows(t *testing.T) {
t.Logf("Setup registered node: %+v", resp)
// Wait for node to be available in NodeStore with debug info
// Wait for node to be available in [state.NodeStore] with debug info
var attemptCount int
require.EventuallyWithT(t, func(c *assert.CollectT) {
@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ func TestAuthenticationFlows(t *testing.T) {
return "", err
}
// Wait for node to be available in NodeStore
// Wait for node to be available in [state.NodeStore]
require.EventuallyWithT(t, func(c *assert.CollectT) {
_, found := app.state.GetNodeByNodeKey(nodeKey1.Public())
assert.True(c, found, "node should be available in NodeStore")
@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ func TestAuthenticationFlows(t *testing.T) {
return "", err
}
// Wait for node to be available in NodeStore
// Wait for node to be available in [state.NodeStore]
require.EventuallyWithT(t, func(c *assert.CollectT) {
_, found := app.state.GetNodeByNodeKey(nodeKey1.Public())
assert.True(c, found, "node should be available in NodeStore")
@ -637,7 +637,7 @@ func TestAuthenticationFlows(t *testing.T) {
return "", err
}
// Wait for node to be available in NodeStore
// Wait for node to be available in [state.NodeStore]
require.EventuallyWithT(t, func(c *assert.CollectT) {
_, found := app.state.GetNodeByNodeKey(nodeKey1.Public())
assert.True(c, found, "node should be available in NodeStore")
@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ func TestAuthenticationFlows(t *testing.T) {
app.state.SetAuthCacheEntry(regID, nodeToRegister)
// Simulate successful registration
// handleRegister will receive the value when it starts waiting
// [Headscale.handleRegister] will receive the value when it starts waiting
go func() {
user := app.state.CreateUserForTest("followup-user")
@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ func TestAuthenticationFlows(t *testing.T) {
},
// TEST: Nil hostinfo is handled with defensive code
// WHAT: Tests that nil hostinfo in register request is handled gracefully
// INPUT: Register request with Hostinfo field set to nil
// INPUT: Register request with [tailcfg.Hostinfo] field set to nil
// EXPECTED: Node registers successfully with generated hostname starting with "node-"
// WHY: Defensive code prevents nil pointer panics; creates valid default hostinfo
{
@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ func TestAuthenticationFlows(t *testing.T) {
validate: func(t *testing.T, resp *tailcfg.RegisterResponse, app *Headscale) { //nolint:thelper //nolint:thelper
assert.True(t, resp.MachineAuthorized)
// With nil Hostinfo the raw hostname stays empty and GivenName
// With nil [tailcfg.Hostinfo] the raw hostname stays empty and GivenName
// falls back to the literal "node" per the SaaS spec.
node, found := app.state.GetNodeByNodeKey(nodeKey1.Public())
assert.True(t, found)
@ -954,7 +954,7 @@ func TestAuthenticationFlows(t *testing.T) {
// TEST: PreAuthKey registration rejects client-provided RequestTags
// WHAT: Tests that PreAuthKey registrations cannot use client-provided tags
// INPUT: PreAuthKey registration with RequestTags in Hostinfo
// INPUT: PreAuthKey registration with [tailcfg.Hostinfo.RequestTags] set
// EXPECTED: Registration fails with "requested tags [...] are invalid or not permitted" error
// WHY: PreAuthKey nodes get their tags from the key itself, not from client requests
{
@ -1240,7 +1240,7 @@ func TestAuthenticationFlows(t *testing.T) {
// TEST: Zero-time expiry is handled correctly
// WHAT: Tests registration with expiry set to zero time value
// INPUT: Register request with Expiry set to time.Time{} (zero value)
// INPUT: Register request with Expiry set to [time.Time]{} (zero value)
// EXPECTED: Node registers successfully; zero time treated as no expiry
// WHY: Zero time is valid Go default; should be handled gracefully
{
@ -1280,7 +1280,7 @@ func TestAuthenticationFlows(t *testing.T) {
},
// TEST: Malformed hostinfo with very long hostname is truncated
// WHAT: Tests that excessively long hostname is truncated to DNS label limit
// INPUT: Hostinfo with 110-character hostname (exceeds 63-char DNS limit)
// INPUT: [tailcfg.Hostinfo] with 110-character hostname (exceeds 63-char DNS limit)
// EXPECTED: Node registers successfully; hostname truncated to 63 characters
// WHY: Defensive code enforces DNS label limit (RFC 1123); prevents errors
{
@ -1845,7 +1845,7 @@ func TestAuthenticationFlows(t *testing.T) {
},
// TEST: Logout with expiry exactly at current time
// WHAT: Tests logout when expiry is set to exact current time (boundary case)
// INPUT: Existing node sends request with expiry=time.Now() (not past, not future)
// INPUT: Existing node sends request with expiry=[time.Now]() (not past, not future)
// EXPECTED: Node is logged out (treated as expired)
// WHY: Edge case: current time should be treated as expired
{
@ -2225,7 +2225,7 @@ func TestAuthenticationFlows(t *testing.T) {
},
// TEST: Interactive workflow with nil hostinfo
// WHAT: Tests interactive registration when request has nil hostinfo
// INPUT: Interactive registration request with Hostinfo=nil
// INPUT: Interactive registration request with [tailcfg.Hostinfo]=nil
// EXPECTED: Node registers successfully with generated default hostname
// WHY: Defensive code handles nil hostinfo in interactive flow
{
@ -2761,7 +2761,7 @@ func TestNodeStoreLookup(t *testing.T) {
t.Logf("Registered node successfully: %+v", resp)
// Wait for node to be available in NodeStore
// Wait for node to be available in [state.NodeStore]
var node types.NodeView
require.EventuallyWithT(t, func(c *assert.CollectT) {
@ -3072,7 +3072,7 @@ func TestWebFlowReauthDifferentUser(t *testing.T) {
})
t.Run("returned_node_is_user2_new_node", func(t *testing.T) {
// The node returned from HandleNodeFromAuthPath should be user2's NEW node
// The node returned from [state.State.HandleNodeFromAuthPath] should be user2's NEW node
assert.Equal(t, user2.ID, node.UserID().Get(), "Returned node should belong to user2")
assert.NotEqual(t, user1NodeID, node.ID(), "Returned node should be NEW, not transferred from user1")
t.Logf("✓ HandleNodeFromAuthPath returned user2's new node (ID: %d)", node.ID())
@ -3166,7 +3166,7 @@ func createTestApp(t *testing.T) *Headscale {
// 1. Node registers successfully with a single-use pre-auth key
// 2. Node is running fine
// 3. Node restarts (e.g., after headscale upgrade or tailscale container restart)
// 4. Node sends RegisterRequest with the same pre-auth key
// 4. Node sends [tailcfg.RegisterRequest] with the same pre-auth key
// 5. BUG: Headscale rejects the request with "authkey expired" or "authkey already used"
//
// Expected behavior:
@ -3223,7 +3223,7 @@ func TestGitHubIssue2830_NodeRestartWithUsedPreAuthKey(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.True(t, usedPak.Used, "pre-auth key should be marked as used after initial registration")
// STEP 2: Simulate node restart - node sends RegisterRequest again with same pre-auth key
// STEP 2: Simulate node restart - node sends [tailcfg.RegisterRequest] again with same pre-auth key
// This happens when:
// - Tailscale container restarts
// - Tailscaled service restarts
@ -3508,7 +3508,7 @@ func TestGitHubIssue2830_ExistingNodeCanReregisterWithUsedPreAuthKey(t *testing.
// WITHOUT THE FIX: This would fail with "authkey already used" error
// WITH THE FIX: This succeeds because it's the same node re-registering with its own key
// Simulate sending the same RegisterRequest again (same MachineKey, same AuthKey)
// Simulate sending the same [tailcfg.RegisterRequest] again (same MachineKey, same AuthKey)
// This is exactly what happens when a container restarts
reregisterReq := tailcfg.RegisterRequest{
Auth: &tailcfg.RegisterResponseAuth{
@ -3787,15 +3787,15 @@ func TestAuthKeyTaggedToUserOwnedViaReauth(t *testing.T) {
nodeAfterReauth.IsTagged(), nodeAfterReauth.UserID().Get())
}
// TestDeletedPreAuthKeyNotRecreatedOnNodeUpdate tests that when a PreAuthKey is deleted,
// subsequent node updates (like those triggered by MapRequests) do not recreate the key.
// TestDeletedPreAuthKeyNotRecreatedOnNodeUpdate tests that when a [types.PreAuthKey] is deleted,
// subsequent node updates (like those triggered by [tailcfg.MapRequest]s) do not recreate the key.
//
// This reproduces the bug where:
// 1. Create a tagged preauthkey and register a node
// 2. Delete the preauthkey (confirmed gone from pre_auth_keys DB table)
// 3. Node sends MapRequest (e.g., after tailscaled restart)
// 3. Node sends [tailcfg.MapRequest] (e.g., after tailscaled restart)
// 4. BUG: The preauthkey reappears because GORM's Updates() upserts the stale AuthKey
// data that still exists in the NodeStore's in-memory cache.
// data that still exists in the [state.NodeStore]'s in-memory cache.
//
// The fix is to use Omit("AuthKey") on all node Updates() calls to prevent GORM
// from touching the AuthKey association.
@ -3864,11 +3864,11 @@ func TestDeletedPreAuthKeyNotRecreatedOnNodeUpdate(t *testing.T) {
require.Nil(t, dbNode.AuthKeyID, "node's AuthKeyID should be NULL after PreAuthKey deletion")
t.Log("Node's AuthKeyID is NULL in database")
// The NodeStore may still have stale AuthKey data in memory.
// Now simulate what happens when the node sends a MapRequest after a tailscaled restart.
// This triggers persistNodeToDB which calls GORM's Updates().
// The [state.NodeStore] may still have stale AuthKey data in memory.
// Now simulate what happens when the node sends a [tailcfg.MapRequest] after a tailscaled restart.
// This triggers [state.State.persistNodeToDB] which calls GORM's Updates().
// Simulate a MapRequest by updating the node through the state layer
// Simulate a [tailcfg.MapRequest] by updating the node through the state layer
// This mimics what poll.go does when processing MapRequests
mapReq := tailcfg.MapRequest{
NodeKey: nodeKey.Public(),
@ -3879,8 +3879,8 @@ func TestDeletedPreAuthKeyNotRecreatedOnNodeUpdate(t *testing.T) {
},
}
// Process the MapRequest-like update
// This calls UpdateNodeFromMapRequest which eventually calls persistNodeToDB
// Process the [tailcfg.MapRequest]-like update
// This calls [state.State.UpdateNodeFromMapRequest] which eventually calls [state.State.persistNodeToDB]
_, err = app.state.UpdateNodeFromMapRequest(node.ID(), mapReq)
require.NoError(t, err, "UpdateNodeFromMapRequest should succeed")
t.Log("Simulated MapRequest update completed")
@ -3943,7 +3943,7 @@ func TestTaggedNodeWithoutUserToDifferentUser(t *testing.T) {
alice := app.state.CreateUserForTest("alice")
require.NotNil(t, alice, "Alice user should be created")
// Step 4: Re-register the node to alice via HandleNodeFromAuthPath
// Step 4: Re-register the node to alice via [state.State.HandleNodeFromAuthPath]
// This is what happens when running: headscale auth register --auth-id <id> --user alice
nodeKey2 := key.NewNode()
registrationID := types.MustAuthID()
@ -3960,7 +3960,7 @@ func TestTaggedNodeWithoutUserToDifferentUser(t *testing.T) {
// This should NOT panic - before the fix, this would panic with:
// panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
// at UserView.Name() because the existing node has no User
// at [types.UserView.Name] because the existing node has no User
nodeAfterReauth, _, err := app.state.HandleNodeFromAuthPath(
registrationID,
types.UserID(alice.ID),
@ -3977,8 +3977,8 @@ func TestTaggedNodeWithoutUserToDifferentUser(t *testing.T) {
require.False(t, nodeAfterReauth.IsTagged(), "Node should no longer be tagged")
require.Empty(t, nodeAfterReauth.Tags().AsSlice(), "Node should have no tags")
// Verify Owner() works without panicking - this is what the mapper's
// generateUserProfiles calls, and it would panic with a nil pointer
// Verify [types.NodeView.Owner] works without panicking - this is what the mapper's
// [generateUserProfiles] calls, and it would panic with a nil pointer
// dereference if node.User was not set during the tag→user conversion.
owner := nodeAfterReauth.Owner()
require.True(t, owner.Valid(), "Owner should be valid after conversion (mapper would panic if nil)")