C1/C2/M9: tighten security boundary at handleUpdate
C1 — Document the process-global MsgAcceptFunc mutation: CoreDNS 1.14.3 doesn't expose per-Config MsgAcceptFunc (server.go:159 hardcodes the dns.Server struct), so the override has to be global. The init()-level comment now explains the operational consequences in detail, and setup() emits a loud INFO log calling out the global scope for operator audit. Upstream support for per-Config MsgAcceptFunc would let us delete the whole stanza. C2 — handleUpdate now requires the caller to assert TSIG verification via an explicit `verified bool` parameter. The security contract is encoded in the function signature, not in convention. ServeDNS passes verified=true after checkTSIG succeeds; verified=false produces an immediate Refused with no state mutation. Future internal callers (NOTIFY relay, admin RPC, refactor) physically cannot reach the mutation code without proving the request was authenticated. M9 — Don't sign TSIG-failure rejection responses. Per Hamilton's finding, signing a rejection with the named key attests "yes, this server holds that key" — useful intel for an attacker probing key existence. Unsigned Refused is the right shape: nsupdate sees "no TSIG on reply" and treats as auth failure, which is what actually happened. New test TestUpdate_UnverifiedCaller_Refused proves the C2 contract: handleUpdate(w, msg, false) refuses, zone file unchanged.
This commit is contained in:
parent
8466f08780
commit
8e421f925e
4 changed files with 104 additions and 23 deletions
29
update.go
29
update.go
|
|
@ -26,10 +26,35 @@ import (
|
|||
// Steps 3-7 happen under the zone-file mutex. If 8 fails we log but
|
||||
// don't roll back (the on-disk state is authoritative; lost commits
|
||||
// can be re-staged via `git add` later).
|
||||
func (p *RFC2136) handleUpdate(w dns.ResponseWriter, r *dns.Msg) (int, error) {
|
||||
//
|
||||
// SECURITY CONTRACT — the `verified` parameter:
|
||||
//
|
||||
// handleUpdate mutates zone files on disk. The caller MUST set
|
||||
// verified=true only after successfully validating the message's TSIG
|
||||
// signature against a configured key. ServeDNS does this. A
|
||||
// verified=false invocation is treated as an unauthenticated attempt
|
||||
// and refused — preserving the security boundary even if a future
|
||||
// internal caller (NOTIFY relay, admin RPC, refactor) reaches this
|
||||
// function without going through the wire-level TSIG check.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Tests that exercise post-auth logic pass verified=true. Tests that
|
||||
// exercise auth rejection pass verified=false.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// This is defense-in-depth: ServeDNS already verifies; we re-assert at
|
||||
// the function boundary so the security property survives refactors.
|
||||
func (p *RFC2136) handleUpdate(w dns.ResponseWriter, r *dns.Msg, verified bool) (int, error) {
|
||||
resp := new(dns.Msg)
|
||||
resp.SetReply(r)
|
||||
signResponseIfSigned(resp, r)
|
||||
if verified {
|
||||
// Only sign responses we authorize. Signing rejections leaks
|
||||
// attestation that the named key exists on this server (see M9
|
||||
// in the Hamilton review). Unauthorized callers get an
|
||||
// unsigned Refused.
|
||||
signResponseIfSigned(resp, r)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
log.Warningf("handleUpdate refused: caller did not assert TSIG verification — possible internal bypass attempt")
|
||||
return p.updateResp(w, resp, dns.RcodeRefused)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// 1. Validate the Zone section.
|
||||
if len(r.Question) != 1 {
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue